The Control of Vibration at Work
Regulations have come into force (see below). Workers whose hands and arms are regularly exposed to high vibration levels
may experience injury to the hands and arm; these injuries include damage to the
blood circulation system and to the nerves and muscles; one of the symptoms can
be finger blanching and numbness which gives the condition its other name of
Vibration White Finger or VWF; however,Replica Watches the correct term is "Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome".
Find out more
at the HSE website.
Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome is typically caused by
using tools, such as jack-hammers
and chain-saws; however, vibration exposure can occur when guiding work-pieces
through machinery, e.g. pedestal grinders.
Assessment of Damage
In the appendix to BS. 6842:1987 "Measurement and Evaluation of Human Exposure
to Vibration Transmitted to the Hand" [replaced by BS EN ISO 5349-1:2001] detailed
methods of measuring and assessing the vibration, the probability of
causing vibration damage symptoms was expressed as follows:
- The daily exposure time required to produce symptoms is inversely
proportional to the square of the vibration level; i.e. 8 hours/day
exposure at any given level is equivalent to 2 hours/day at twice
the vibration level.
- In terms of years of exposure, the probability of developing
finger blanching [Taylor Pelmear Stage I symptoms] is inversely
proportional to the level of the vibration. Consequently, if the
vibration level is halved, the time before the onset of symptoms will
tend to be doubled; i.e. 3 years' exposure at any given vibration level,
is a likely to produce the same degree of finger blanching as
6 years exposure at half that vibration level.
- It appears that with normal tool usage,Rolex Replica symptoms do not usually
occur if the frequency weighted acceleration is below about
1.0 m/s? [certain frequencies are more damaging than others and
therefore are given more weight]. Thus for a low-vibration tool [below
1.0 m/s?], it is unlikely that any damage will occur no matter how
long the exposure.
It can be seen that the relationship between daily exposure, years at any
given exposure and vibration magnitude are complex. The equivalent exposures are
produced in Table 5 of BS.6842:1987. This table reproduced below gives the
equivalent exposures at which would produce finger blanching symptoms in 10% of
an exposed population:
Table of Frequency Weighted Vibration Magnitudes [m/s?
r.m.s.] which may be expected to produce finger blanching in 10% of
population |
Daily Exposure Hours |
Exposure Duration [years] |
? |
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
8 |
44.8 |
22.4 |
11.2 |
5.6 |
2.8 |
1.4 |
4 |
64.0 |
32.0 |
16.0 |
8.0 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
2 |
89.6 |
44.8 |
22.4 |
11.2 |
5.6 |
2.8 |
1 |
128.0 |
64.0 |
32.0 |
16.0 |
8.0 |
4.0 |
? |
179.2 |
89.6 |
44.8 |
22.4 |
11.2 |
5.6 |
? |
256.0 |
128.0 |
64.0 |
32.0 |
16.0 |
8.0 |
In an investigation of a employee?s vibration history, the first factor
looked for, is use of a tool which would produce a frequency weighted
acceleration in excess of 1.0 m/s?; then, if the vibration dosage would have caused finger blanching [or worse] in more than
10% of an exposed population.
Preventative Measures
At Appendix B of BS. 6842:1987, various methods of reducing the risk of
vibration white finger damage were recommended:
- Measure the vibration.
- Where appropriate and reasonably practicable,
choose a process to minimise and control the vibration exposure.
- Maintain equipment carefully in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions.
- Arrange for pre-employment medical screening, and at regular intervals for as long as
the vibration exposure continues.
- Encourage employees to report finger blanching
when it first occurs and if there is a deterioration.
- All individuals who use vibrating equipment should be advised of
the risk of exposure to hand arm vibration.
- Control work schedules to include rest breaks.
The Control of Vibration at
Work Regulations 2005
Further and more
comprehensive details of the Control of Vibration at Work
Regulations 2005 can be read in
the HSE publications INDG175 and L140. The following is a brief
extract of INDG1755.
The Exposure Action Value
The exposure action value (EAV) is a
daily amount of vibration exposure above which employers are
required to take action to control exposure. The greater the
exposure level, the greater the risk and the more control
employers will need to install. For hand-arm
vibration the EAV is a daily exposure of 2.5 m/s2 A(8).
The Exposure Limit Value
The exposure limit value (ELV) is
the maximum amount of vibration an employee may be exposed to on
any single day. For hand-arm vibration the ELV is a daily
exposure of 5 m/s2 A(8). It represents a high risk above which
employees should not be exposed.
The Regulations allow a transitional
period for the limit value until July 2010. This only applies to
work equipment already in use before July 2007. The exposure
limit value may be exceeded during the transitional period as
long as the employer has complied with all the other
requirements of the Regulations and taken all reasonably
practicable actions to reduce exposure as far as possible.
Requirements
The
Control of Vibration at Work Regulations require employers to
-
assess the
vibration risk to employees;
-
decide if they
are likely to be exposed above the daily exposure action value (EAV)
and if they are:
-
introduce a programme of control to eliminate risk, or
reduce exposure to as low a level as is reasonably practicable;
-
provide health surveillance (regular health checks) to
those employees who continue to be regularly exposed above the
action value or otherwise continue to be at risk;
-
decide if
they are likely to be exposed above the daily exposure limit
value (ELV) and if they are:
-
take immediate action to reduce
their exposure below the limit value
-
provide information and training to
employees on health risks and the actions taken to control those
risks.
-
consult a trade union safety
representative or employee representative on the proposals to
control risk and to provide health surveillance;
-
keep a record
of the risk assessment and control actions;
-
keep health
records for employees under health surveillance
-
review and
update risk assessments regularly.
|